What are the advantages and disadvantages of the collegium system in India and how can the system be improved to make it more efficient and effective?

 

What are the main criticisms of the collegium system in India and what are the proposed solutions to address these issues?

The collegium system in India refers to the method of appointing and transferring judges in the higher judiciary, specifically the Supreme Court and the High Courts. Under this system, a panel of senior judges, known as the collegium, recommends appointments and transfers to the President of India for approval. The system was established by the Supreme Court in the 1993 judgment in the case of Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India.

The collegium system in India refers to the method of appointing and transferring judges in the higher judiciary, specifically the Supreme Court and the High Courts. It was established by the Supreme Court in the 1993 judgment in the case of Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India. The system is based on the principle of the judiciary being self-governing and independent from the executive and the legislature. Under the collegium system, a panel of senior judges, known as the collegium, recommends appointments and transfers of judges to the President of India for approval.

The constitutional position of the collegium system is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution of India. However, the Constitution does provide for the independence of the judiciary and the separation of powers between the judiciary, the executive, and the legislature. The Constitution also provides for the appointment of judges by the President in consultation with the judiciary. The collegium system was established by the Supreme Court as an interpretation of this provision and as a means of ensuring the independence of the judiciary in the appointment and transfer process.

The Constitution of India provides for the appointment of judges in the higher judiciary under Articles 124, 217, and 222.

• Article 124(2) provides for the appointment of judges of the Supreme Court by the President in consultation with such of the judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts in the States as the President may deem necessary for the purpose.

• Article 217(1) provides for the appointment of judges of the High Courts by the President in consultation with the Chief Justice of India, the Governor of the state and the Chief Justice of the High Court.

• Article 222(1) provides for the transfer of judges of the High Courts from one High Court to another by the President in consultation with the Chief Justice of India and the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned.

  
  

The collegium system has been the subject of much debate and criticism over the years. Some argue that it is necessary to ensure the independence of the judiciary and protect it from political interference, while others argue that it is opaque and lacks transparency, and that it should be replaced with a more transparent and accountable system. The constitutional position of the collegium system is still a matter of ongoing debate in India.

There are several cases related to the collegium system and the appointment of judges in India that have been heard by the Supreme Court. Some of the notable cases include:

Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India (1993): This case established the collegium system for the appointment and transfer of judges in the higher judiciary. The Supreme Court held that the judiciary should have a dominant role in the appointment of judges, in order to ensure the independence of the judiciary.

In Re: Special Reference 1 of 1998 (1998): This case dealt with the issue of transparency in the collegium system. The Supreme Court held that the minutes of the meetings of the collegium should be kept and made available to the public, in order to ensure transparency in the appointment process.

Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms v. Union of India (2018): This case dealt with the issue of corruption in the appointment of judges. The Supreme Court held that the government should disclose the reasons for rejecting a candidate recommended by the collegium for appointment as a judge.

Supreme Court of India v. Union of India and others (2019): This case dealt with the issue of transparency in the appointment process. The Supreme Court held that the records of the collegium's decision-making process should be made public, in order to ensure transparency and accountability in the appointment process.

Supreme Court of India v. Union of India and others (2020): This case dealt with the issue of the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) Act, 2014 and the 99th Constitutional Amendment Act, which sought to change the collegium system of appointment of judges. The Supreme Court struck down the NJAC Act and the 99th Constitutional Amendment Act, thus upheld the collegium system for the appointment of judges.

These cases have helped to shape the current understanding of the collegium system and the appointment of judges in India, and have established the principle of independence of judiciary and the need for transparency and accountability in the appointment process.

Pros of the Collegium System:

•  The collegium system ensures that appointments and transfers of judges are made by a body of senior judges, who are best equipped to assess the qualifications and suitability of candidates for the judiciary.
• The system ensures that the judiciary is insulated from political interference in the appointment and transfer of judges.
• The collegium system allows for transparency in the appointment and transfer process, as the recommendations of the collegium are made public.

Cons of the Collegium System:

• The collegium system has been criticized for being opaque and lacking transparency. The minutes of the meetings of the collegium are not made public, and the criteria for the selection of judges are not clearly defined.
• The collegium system has been criticized for being dominated by a small group of senior judges, leading to a lack of diversity and representation among the higher judiciary.
• The collegium system has also been criticized for being slow in taking decisions on appointments and transfers, leading to vacancies in the higher judiciary.

UPSC GS 1 - Effects of globalization on Indian society #UPSCSeries #AspireGPSC

Possible Solutions:

• To address the issue of transparency, the minutes of the meetings of the collegium should be made public, and the criteria for the selection of judges should be clearly defined and made public.

• To address the issue of diversity and representation, the collegium should be expanded to include more judges from different regions and backgrounds, and should also include representation from other stakeholders such as legal academics and members of the bar.

• To address the issue of delays in decision-making, the collegium should be given a time-bound mandate to make recommendations on appointments and transfers.

In conclusion,

The collegium system in India has its merits, but it also has its drawbacks. It is important to address the issues of transparency, diversity and representation, and delays in decision-making in order to make the system more efficient and effective.